12/22/2023 0 Comments Captur suvSome have complained that this car’s rear headspace and legroom may not be comfortable enough for tall folks. For instance, its 472 L/1487 L (minimum/maximum) boot space is far ahead of Captur’s 404 L/1275 L. However, the Kadjar is more spacious and practical. The Renault Kadjar is the bigger (though younger) sibling of the Captur.Īs far as the interior goes, this C-segment SUV offers features similar to what’s found in the Captur, including wireless charging, 7″ capacitive touchscreen that enables you to display your smartphone screen on the car screen, etc. For instance, its boot volume is 504 L with upright rear seats and 1593 with folded seats. However, the Qashqai is roomier than the Captur. One owner even says his Qashqai has proven to be one of the most reliable cars he’s had, right up there with the likes of Toyota.įuel economy in the Qashqai is rated as 44.7 MPG/ combined, which is lower than the Captur’s rating ofĤ7.9 MPG. It’s the perfect blend of the eye-catching exterior, premium, comfortable, and practical interior, and remarkable reliability. This car has sold over 3.3 million to date, and many owners say they are comfortable with their car, and the reasons for its success aren’t far-fetched. Qashqai is a popular family car in many regions. Some refer to the Qashqai as the “King of crossovers.” And that’s because this Nissan car pioneered the compact SUV by blending hatchback compactness and SUV practicality in 2007. You might also like: Which VW Models Have DSG Transmission? (Answered) 3. Owners report that the Clio car parts are easy to find and cheap to maintain, which is expected, considering the Clio car is a common and reliable one. So you get a better view of the road from a Captur than you would from a Clio. SUV scenario, the Captur is set up with a relatively higher driving position. Consequently, the Clio offers better fuel economy- you’re looking at 54.4 MPG/combined in the Clio versus Captur’s 47.9 MPG/combined.Īlso, the Clio’s boot volume - 391 liters minimum and 1069 liters with rear seats folded - is less than the Captur’s 401 liters (or 1275 liters max).Įven though this supermini isn’t as roomy as the Captur, it’s still roomy enough to seat five adults comfortably.Īs expected in a supermini vs. Now, this supermini is a smaller and lighter car than the Captur. It’s also the basis for the Captur’s engineering design. The Clio is the best selling French car of all time. To top it all off, the starting purchase prices for both cars are within the same range. Its boot volume of 434 L (or 1467 L max.) exceeds Captur’s boot space. This car is also relatively larger, with lots of knee room and headspace to keep you comfy during long rides. Its stylish interior beats most competing cars in the compact crossover category. The Peugeot 2008’s elegant interior is one of its biggest selling points. Its combined fuel consumption rate falls within 41.7-52.6/MPG, a similar range to the Captur’s. But it also has a fully electric version called the e-2008. Like the Captur, the 2008 is available in petrol and diesel engines. One driver reported that its handling compares well with other high-riding vehicles, and another said it’s a joy to own. The Peugeot 2008’s futuristic look and excellent design features make it one of Captur’s most notable rivals.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |